|
Writer Speaks On Drug Testing
URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1447/a10.html
Newshawk: chip
Pubdate: Mon, 11 Oct 2004
Source: Daily Beacon, The (TN Edu)
Copyright: 2004 The Daily Beacon
Contact:
letters@utk.edu
Website: http://dailybeacon.utk.edu/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2321
Author: Patrick Tucker, Staff Writer
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm
(Drug Testing)
WRITER SPEAKS ON DRUG TESTING
The drug testing industry and with the detoxification industry
have both grown into multi-billion dollar industries since the
1980s with 60 percent of all companies and 40 percent of the
Fortune 500 testing for illegal drugs, a visiting lecturer said
Friday.
Kenneth Tunnell of Eastern Kentucky University promoted his new
book, "Pissing on Demand," at a University of Tennesee
lecture.
"Companies became convinced that employees who used drugs
were costing them billions in producitivity losses and so they
began to test," Tunnell said.
The Supreme Court's ruling that drug testing does not violate the
Fourth or Fifth Amendments and Reagan's new "war on
drugs," allowed workplace drug testing to become very common.
Testing grew from less than 10 percent of companies testing in
1983 to 67 percent testing in 1993. With this drug-testing
explosion came a counter industry which seeks to market products
for employees to resist these tests.
He likened these companies to hawkers of radar detectors and
previously written term papers.
"I don't want to romanticize them, but they are a kind of
resistance," Tunnell said.
With names like "Urine Luck" and the ever-popular
"Ready Clean," they market mostly ingestable products
that they claim removes all toxins from the body. He said
that they are mostly diuretics and can be effective if taken
properly with lots of water.
Companies spend an awful lot of money to do drug testing but
usually make it back and then some with all the tax breaks that
the government gives them for doing the testing.
"It seems that companies are not that concerned with their
employees' health but rather concerned with policing, that's why
you typically don't see them testing for asbestos," which can
be harmful to employees' health, Tunnell said.
Policing is exactly what it is, because the tests that the
companies do only reveal drug use that has happened - not that it
is happening.
"So what you have got," he said, "is a company
knowing you smoked weed four weeks ago but not what you may or may
not have done today," Tunnell said. "Not to
mention that when they test, they can actually test for many more
drugs such as lithium, prozac or hydrocodone, which most people
would not want their employers knowing they were taking."
Jason Giglio, manager at Calhoun's on the river, said that
"testing is not done unless it's suspected, caught
or an injury occurs that requires medical treatment."
"If we drug tested in this business we'd have no
employees," he said.
The lecture was part of the UT Science Forum which holds a
"brown-bag" lecture most Fridays. The next one
will be Oct. 22 in Dining Room C in Thompson-Boling Arena.
|
|