|
Cop's Report States How Much Drug Users Spend
URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1466/a05.html
Newshawk: Herb
Pubdate: Thu, 14 Oct 2004
Source: Georgia Straight, The (CN BC)
Copyright: 2004 The Georgia Straight
Contact:
editor@straight.com
Website: http://www.straight.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1084
Author: Charlie Smith
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/coke.htm
(Cocaine)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/heroin.htm
(Heroin)
COP'S REPORT STATES HOW MUCH DRUG USERS SPEND
Two-thirds of heroin and cocaine users in a Downtown Eastside
survey have admitted to spending at least $50 per day on illicit
drugs. Almost half admitted they spend $100 or more per day,
according to the study conducted by two SFU students.
Over an eight-day period in January 2003, SFU students Gareth
Bradley and Jennifer Parks were accompanied by Vancouver police
Const. Gerry Wickstead as they surveyed 100 people using
cocaine or heroin in alleys. According to a 224-page report
written by Wickstead, the officer identified himself and told
respondents that they wouldn't be charged and their drugs wouldn't
be confiscated.
"One of the respondents told us how he recently spent his
entire insurance settlement of $30,000 on drugs," Wickstead
wrote in the report Treadmill of Addiction. "He came
from Vancouver's Kitsilano neighbourhood and rented a room on the
Hastings strip for one big month-long drug binge. Once the
street people heard of his new found wealth he quickly acquired an
abundance of friends."
Wickstead noted that a person with a legitimate job would have to
earn at least $52,000 per year to afford a $100-per-day drug
habit, assuming a 30-percent annual income-tax bill. Almost
60 percent of the drug users surveyed said they would take drug
treatment if it were available to them, and 65 percent said it
would be best to have treatment facilities outside of Vancouver.
Wickstead wrote that the drug users openly admitted to committing
crimes on a daily basis. One said there was no other place
in the world where someone could sell drugs across the street from
the police station, and almost all said there was no fear of
prosecution on the Downtown Eastside.
"More tax-free money can pass through their hands each day
than the average working citizen may see in a week,"
Wickstead reported. "They rarely get caught
and criminally charged for their actions."
He also cited Statistics Canada figures suggesting that in 2001,
nobody was criminally charged in 99 percent of reported thefts
from autos, theft of bicycles, and distributing counterfeit
currency. The report stated that in 2000, on average, there
were 50 reported violent crimes and 599 reported property crimes
per day in B.C. that remained unsolved. Just over a
third of the drug users in the survey claimed that people are
deterred from committing crimes when there is a "strong
police presence" on the Downtown Eastside.
The report suggested there was little enforcement, which is part
of the city's four-pillars approach for addressing illicit-drug
addiction.
Rob Morgan, president of the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users,
told the Straight that he questions the methodology of having a
police officer present during interviews. "On the
Downtown Eastside, the Vancouver police are known publicly and
personally as being violent towards drug offenders and drug
users," he alleged.
Morgan claimed that he supported his crack-cocaine habit in 2001
and 2002 by working at a temporary agency. "A lot of my
friends worked at temp agencies to feed our addiction," he
said.
VANDU project coordinator Ann Livingston told the Straight that
Wickstead adopted a "practical" approach by examining
the relationship between drug addiction and crime. However,
she said she disagreed with his overall message that there needs
to be more enforcement. "It's odd that he would draw
the conclusion that we need more police," she said.
"I would draw the conclusion that we need more heroin
prescriptions."
Livingston added that she regrets that Wickstead didn't examine
the cost of drug addiction to the health-care system. She
also suggested that many addicts end up in jail because they
breach an undertaking to avoid an area or fail to appear in court.
|
|